News blog for Seattle's Fremont neighborhood


Construction begins soon on bridge barrier

By master · August 26th, 2009 · 10 Comments

Editor’s note: This is the first column written by lifetime Fremont resident Kirby Lindsay, who has written for the North Seattle Herald-Outlook and the Seattle Press. We’re happy to welcome her as a regular contributor.

On September 2nd, bids for construction of a safety barrier on the George Washington Memorial Bridge are scheduled to be opened, according to Washington Department of Transportation (WSDOT) spokesperson Greg Phipps. Phipps reported a contractor shall be announced in mid-September. Currently construction of the barrier on the bridge, more commonly known as Aurora, is scheduled to begin in January or February but Phipps admitted, “there is a chance it could be earlier.”

After two years of public meetings and consideration among representatives of the City of Seattle and the State of Washington, construction plan cleared final hurdles on June 3rd when WSDOT representatives presented their final plan to the City of Seattle Landmarks Preservation Board. Beth Chave, coordinator for the board, reported issuance of a certificate of approval for changes to the bridge, listed on the National Register of Historic Places, the Washington Heritage Register and a designated City landmark, on June 16, 2009.

(Photo by WSDOT of a mock up panel installed as a test on March 29th.)

A Difficult Decision

“The vote was close, but the board doesn’t always vote unanimously,” Chave explained, “It was a difficult decision for the board.” The decision came amidst much controversy. Public comment before the vote included three representatives from Queen Anne Community Council and Eric Pihl, a member of the Fremont Neighborhood Council, who spoke against this barrier plan. A couple residents who live within sight of the bridge and spoke in favor it.

According to Chave, her office sent copies of the certificate of approval “to an extensive list of people,” although this is not standard procedure. Citizens who had written to the Landmarks Board requesting information about this project were proactively sent copies. “On the second page it explains how to appeal,” Chave said. An appeal of the decision had to be filed with the Hearing Examiner within 14 days of issuance and, according to Chave, “no appeal was filed.”

Construction Begins Soon

This leaves WSDOT free to move forward on a barrier, intended to deter people from attempting suicide by jumping from the bridge. It is also expected to provide safety, and less trauma, to those who live, work and move about beneath the towering structure. “We are proceeding with construction and we wouldn’t do that if there were an appeal,” Phipps asserted.

As to when construction will begin, it depends upon the contractor. “Contractors are looking at the plans,” Phipps explained, “we don’t know how many will bid.” WSDOT has specified night closures for work on the bridge deck, with traffic limited to one lane in a single direction at such times. Phipps admitted nighttime construction could create noise problems for those who live close, but will allow for normal traffic flow during high volume times.

The WSDOT web site says installation is scheduled for “early 2010,” but Phipps explained, “We will know more when we have a contractor on board.” The contractor, in conjunction with other local agencies, will ultimately decide the schedule for the work. Although, as Phipps asserted, “There will be information sent out” as WSDOT sets a construction calendar.

(Photo provided by Ryan Thurston of anxious witnesses to someone poised on the bridge, contemplating suicide in November, 2008.)

A Personal Note:

Efforts to build a barrier of some kind began in earnest in April of 2007 due in large part to Ryan Thurston, founder of Seattle F.R.I.E.N.D.S. (FRemont Individuals & Employees Nonprofit to Decrease Suicides) ( Later this year, despite his triumph in his first foray into community activism, Thurston has chosen to leave Fremont to realize a personal goal, that of graduate school.

10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 ryanhealy // Aug 27, 2009 at 11:10 am

    Very happy this is getting done. It’s a humanitarian victory, of sorts.

  • 2 Gerry Byrke // Aug 27, 2009 at 2:39 pm

    great article Kirby. Very informative and easy read. thanks for FRIENDS for getting the job done. I worked under this bridge 19 years and was sick every time some one jumped. I hope no one will have that experience.

  • 3 Gwen // Aug 27, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    I’m so excited to get my Fremont news fix from one of my favorite LOCAL columnists, Kirby!!! Thank you for your great article on this very important subject.

  • 4 Pat // Aug 31, 2009 at 4:03 pm

    Yes, we need to help prevent people from taking their lives, but this is the wrong solution. Why should we all be penned in by an ugly fence of prison bars when a net would be more effective, less expensive, and less ugly. The fence is not going to prevent determined people from climbing over it, but it will make it much harder for law enforcement to do anything about it once someone is hanging from the other side. They’re installing a net on the Golden Gate bridge after an extensive study of the problem, and it’s a shame we weren’t smart enough and patient enough to arrive at that same solution.

  • 5 Sostainable // Sep 6, 2009 at 9:26 am

    Just one minor suggestion . The barrier isn’t to “intended to deter people from attempting suicide by jumping from the bridge” but to prevent them from dying by suicide.

    There are standard ways to cover suicide stories in the press – Research indicates that the way suicide is reported in the media can contribute to additional suicides and suicide attempts. Conversely, stories about suicide can inform readers and viewers about the likely causes of suicide, its warning signs, trends in suicide rates, and recent treatment advances.

    Avoid using the words “committed suicide” or “failed” or “successful” suicide attempt.

    Reason: The verb “committed” is usually associated with sins or crimes. Suicide is better understood in a behavioral health context than a criminal context. Consider using the phrase “died by suicide.” The phrases “successful suicide” or “failed suicide attempt” imply favorable or inadequate outcomes. Consider using “death by suicide” or “non-fatal suicide attempt.”

  • 6 Storage Containers // Oct 6, 2009 at 3:00 am

    Its a great article.I think that an ugly fence of prison bars when a net would be more effective, less expensive, and less ugly.The fence is not going to prevent determined people from climbing over it, but it will make it much harder for law enforcement to do anything about it once someone is hanging from the other side.

    Storage Containers,

  • 7 Autumn Pulver // Oct 13, 2009 at 11:19 pm

    Kirby – thank you so much for the story. We met a couple years ago when you were writing something on the barrier for the Herald. I am with Seattle FRIENDS, and I am absolutely THRILLED that this is going forward. Last week there was another one, and this week… well I think there's been more. I am just sickened every time it happens, and devastated for the families and friends of victims. This barrier, inspired by the many lost over the edge, will save lives. Plan and simple. Thanks again Kirby!

  • 8 Files search engine // Jan 28, 2010 at 12:17 pm

    As usual. All the problem is in the politicians who are able to solve an ergent problem during two years.

  • 9 Construction Jobs In Dubai // Jan 28, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    They could save more money if they will use a net rather than those prison like bars well they should have thought about this project carefully

  • 10 Lilia // Apr 21, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    You can build whatever you want. If someone is keen on committing suicide, they will do it anyway. I'd rather see someone jump off a bridge than jump in front of my car.
    Lilia Gephardt | Web Hosting

More News from North Seattle